search

Daniel Brands vs Luke Bambridge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brands vs Bambridge analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Daniel Brands vs Luke Bambridge Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Brands 0 - 0 Bambridge

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brands has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bambridge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brands, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bambridge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Brands has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bambridge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Brands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bambridge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141). Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brands winning 1 times and Bambridge being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Brands winning 2 and Bambridge winning 1. The last match between Brands and Bambridge was at the Surbiton Challenger, 03-06-2018, Q2 round, Grass with Daniel Brands getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:34.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Brands and Bambridge have played a deciding set 1 times, with Brands winning 1 times and Bambridge 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Brands winning 1, and Bambridge 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brands has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bambridge has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bambridge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Brands has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bambridge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Daniel Brands

13

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

36

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

29

Age

R

Plays

Luke Bambridge

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L L W L W L W W L

Form

L L W L L L W L L L

Career Total W/L

YTD W/L

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

YTD Titles

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Daniel Brands vs Luke Bambridge For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Brands VS Bambridge

Brands VS Bambridge H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Daniel Brands Luke Bambridge
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 19 17
Aces (Total) 22 27
DFs (Total) 5 5
Avg Match Time 2:9:34 2:9:34
1st Serve % 71% (80/113) 61% (74/121)
1st Serve Win% 78% (62/80) 80% (59/74)
2nd Serve Win% 55% (18/33) 43% (20/47)
BPs Won% (Total) 22% (2/9) 25% (1/4)
Return Points W% 35% (42/121) 29% (33/113)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Brands VS Bambridge H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4
cross
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71% ( 80 of 113)
1st Serve %
61% ( 74 of 121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78% ( 62 of 80)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 59 of 74)
55% ( 18 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 20 of 47)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
29% ( 33 of 113)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 42 of 121)
122
Total Points Won
112

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Daniel Brands Luke Bambridge
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64% ( 72 of 112)
1st Serve %
64% ( 75 of 118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81% ( 58 of 72)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 45 of 75)
45% ( 18 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 15 of 43)
56% ( 9 of 16)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
32% ( 36 of 112)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 58 of 118)
134
Total Points Won
96
L
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 H2H
Q2
cross
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66% ( 93 of 140)
1st Serve %
73% ( 80 of 109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78% ( 73 of 93)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 61 of 80)
43% ( 20 of 47)
2nd Serve Won
62% ( 18 of 29)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
9% ( 1 of 11)
34% ( 47 of 140)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 30 of 109)
123
Total Points Won
126
W
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77% ( 40 of 52)
1st Serve %
69% ( 33 of 48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78% ( 31 of 40)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 9 of 15)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 19 of 48)
56
Total Points Won
44
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59% ( 44 of 75)
1st Serve %
62% ( 39 of 63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77% ( 34 of 44)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 25 of 39)
52% ( 16 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 12 of 24)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
33% ( 25 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 26 of 63)
76
Total Points Won
62
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66% ( 37 of 56)
1st Serve %
62% ( 29 of 47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve Won
83% ( 24 of 29)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 9)
29% ( 16 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 16 of 47)
56
Total Points Won
47
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69% ( 70 of 101)
1st Serve %
76% ( 67 of 88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76% ( 53 of 70)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 53 of 67)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 6 of 21)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
31% ( 31 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 29 of 88)
99
Total Points Won
90
L
5-7 6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71% ( 49 of 69)
1st Serve %
67% ( 45 of 67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76% ( 37 of 49)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 34 of 45)
65% ( 13 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 11 of 22)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
28% ( 19 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 22 of 67)
72
Total Points Won
64
W
6-3 3-6 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59% ( 26 of 44)
1st Serve %
61% ( 27 of 44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81% ( 21 of 26)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
27% ( 12 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 27 of 44)
59
Total Points Won
29
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53% ( 24 of 45)
1st Serve %
58% ( 31 of 53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71% ( 17 of 24)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 6 of 22)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
38% ( 17 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 31 of 53)
59
Total Points Won
39
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69% ( 42 of 61)
1st Serve %
51% ( 35 of 68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79% ( 33 of 42)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 23 of 35)
74% ( 14 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 17 of 33)
17% ( 2 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
23% ( 14 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 28 of 68)
75
Total Points Won
54
L
6-1 7-6(4) H2H

Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve %
60% ( 41 of 68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82% ( 31 of 38)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 32 of 41)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 13 of 27)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 15 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 23 of 68)
68
Total Points Won
60
L
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47% ( 47 of 99)
1st Serve %
48% ( 50 of 104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83% ( 39 of 47)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 35 of 50)
46% ( 24 of 52)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 27 of 54)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
36% ( 36 of 99)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 42 of 104)
105
Total Points Won
98
L
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
Q2
cross
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71% ( 80 of 113)
1st Serve %
61% ( 74 of 121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78% ( 62 of 80)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 59 of 74)
55% ( 18 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 20 of 47)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
29% ( 33 of 113)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 42 of 121)
122
Total Points Won
112
L
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70% ( 43 of 61)
1st Serve %
70% ( 37 of 53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79% ( 34 of 43)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 22 of 37)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
63% ( 10 of 16)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
26% ( 16 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 21 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
48
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60% ( 39 of 65)
1st Serve %
51% ( 31 of 61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77% ( 30 of 39)
1st Serve Won
81% ( 25 of 31)
58% ( 15 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 16 of 30)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 20 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 20 of 61)
65
Total Points Won
61
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve %
51% ( 32 of 63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74% ( 26 of 35)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 13 of 31)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
31% ( 15 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 34 of 63)
68
Total Points Won
44
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
Q2
cross
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64% ( 49 of 76)
1st Serve %
53% ( 48 of 91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 32 of 48)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
21% ( 3 of 14)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
28% ( 21 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 34 of 91)
89
Total Points Won
78
L
6-2 3-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50% ( 28 of 56)
1st Serve %
48% ( 21 of 44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71% ( 20 of 28)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 13 of 21)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
36% ( 20 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 20 of 44)
56
Total Points Won
44
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q2
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65% ( 52 of 80)
1st Serve %
46% ( 39 of 84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65% ( 34 of 52)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 25 of 39)
68% ( 19 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
34% ( 27 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 36 of 84)
89
Total Points Won
75
L
7-5 7-6(3) H2H

Brands Vs Bambridge Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Brands are available here and Bambridge photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions